Daniels Blog

As we are in the process of finishing the documentation for version 6.6,  I wanted to show you a quick video that was created by our support technician Andrew.  He was getting ready to do some training for a company, and since the company wants to use version 6.6, he wanted to show them how to easily create parametric formulas using the custom functions.  One of the hardest concepts in Microvellum is to write a parametric polyline machining token that uses hard locked and formula driven values.  It can get very confusing trying to get the syntax correct and have it work the way you want it to.  In this video he creates this parametric formula using almost no, formula creation.  In fact, almost everything done is based on the part name.  Seeing these functions being used in this way has really got me excited about the possibilities that are opening up with Version 6.6. 

P.S. Every thing done here was done with build 19 of version 6.6 that is avialable in the download section now.

Lately in support I have been asked the question “What is the best style to draw your drawings in, 2D or 3D?”  So I thought I would post my thoughts here and see what everyone else’s opinion is as well.

I don’t think there is a right or wrong answer for this question and really comes down to personal preference.  For me, I would work in 3D.  It is what I first starting using when working with AutoCAD and Microvellum and in support we troubleshooting machining operations and need to see what machining operations are showing in the product.  Drawing in 3D allows us to see exactly where machining operations are being done on the parts and where the parts relate to one another in space. 

The problem with 3D drawings is the complexity added to the drawing.  When working with new AutoCAD and Microvellum users, you can really tell that the concept of “3D Space” is much harder to understand then a flat 2D drawing.  Then having to move parts from one point to another point can be tricky without a little practice.

Then there is the problem with getting clean looking submittals.  If you haven’t already, get AutoCAD 2007 or above.  AutoCAD has created really cool commands that can help you get the view that you need.  Using “3DCLIPS” and “SECTIONPLANE” can help you hide the objects that are preventing you from getting an elevation view or plan view of your room.

So 3D will work wonderfully if you need to see you’re machining and really understand “3D Space”, but if you know that your library has machining that works on your cabinets and you need a quick, clean looking submittal then 2D is going to be great.

Drawing in 2D really shines when you have a drawing template setup with your dimensions styles, colors, and other variables already setup.  2D really allows you to quickly draw a plan view and elevation view of a room.  If you want to take it one step further you can setup each library product with “Prompts Drawing Tokens” so when they are added to the drawing they draw exactly the way you want.

It all comes down to personal preference and what you are comfortable with. 

So what do you use?  Feel free to add your comments and experiences with drawing in 2D or 3D for other Microvellum users.

This question comes up pretty often so I decided to create a video and document that goes through setting up a custom AutoCAD drawing template.  There is no sound with the video but it will quickly demonstrate how to go about modiying a drawing template.  The document follows the video and describes the commands used to get to the different potions of AutoCAD.

Video Link: http://www.microvellum.com/download/blog/Drawing%20Template.html (7 minutes)

Document Download: http://www.microvellum.com/download/blog/Setting%20up%20a%20Drawing%20Template.doc

 http://www.microvellum.com/download/blog/New%20Perfect%20Graining%20Feature.doc

Testing 123